This review details a four-and-a-half-year durability test of a Nexgrill propane gas grill, purchased from Home Depot for $200. The author explores the cost-effectiveness of budget-friendly grills compared to higher-priced models, offering a real-world perspective on long-term ownership. This in-depth analysis examines the grill's performance throughout its lifespan, highlighting both its strengths and weaknesses, including initial functionality, the eventual need for part replacements, and the significant rust damage that ultimately rendered the grill unusable.The review provides a candid assessment of the grill's longevity and the associated costs, considering factors such as the frequency of use and the trade-off between initial investment and long-term expenses. Readers will gain valuable insights into the practical implications of choosing a budget-friendly grill and can use this information to make an informed decision about their own grilling needs and budget. The author's experience provides a compelling case study for those contemplating a similar purchase.
Pros And Cons
- Relatively inexpensive ($200)
- Easy to find replacement parts
- Good quality grates (though requiring replacement after 2.5 years)
- Short lifespan (approximately 4.5 years)
- Significant rusting after 3 years, leading to structural failure
- Flavor cover rusted after 3 years
- Burners fell and rested on the bottom after 3 years
- Side table broke after 2 years
Read more: 10 Best Commercial Charcoal Grills: A Buyer's Guide
Initial Purchase and Expectations
I purchased a Nexgrill propane gas grill from Home Depot for $200 approximately four and a half years ago. My initial expectations were modest given the price point. I anticipated a grill that would provide adequate grilling functionality for a few years, understanding that it might not be as durable or feature-rich as higher-end models.
The grill performed its basic functions well for a considerable amount of time, exceeding my initial expectations in terms of longevity. However, I was also aware that cheaper grills tend to have shorter lifespans.
The overall initial impression was positive, considering it fulfilled its primary purpose of cooking food outdoors at an affordable price. This was a good budget-friendly option for someone without extensive grilling needs.
Rust and Degradation Over Time
After four and a half years of use, the grill succumbed to significant rust damage. The top of the grill completely separated from the base due to extensive rust, rendering it unusable. This was the primary reason I decided to replace the grill.
Despite keeping it covered most of the time, the rust developed extensively. The level of rust suggests a vulnerability of this material to weather elements, even with preventative measures.
This extensive rust is a clear indication of a relatively short lifespan for a grill at this price point. The level of rust makes it a considerable safety hazard.
Internal Components and Replacements
Throughout its lifespan, I needed to replace a few parts. The flavorizer bars rusted severely after around three years, and some burners began to fail and rest on the bottom.
The grates themselves were surprisingly durable, only requiring replacement around two and a half years into ownership. Replacing parts was relatively straightforward. Part replacements are a common expense for budget-friendly grills.
These internal component failures are common in lower-cost grills. While replacing parts is manageable, this adds to the total cost of ownership.
Cost-Effectiveness and Long-Term Value
The $200 investment yielded approximately four and a half years of use. This raises the question of whether it is more cost-effective to repeatedly buy budget grills or invest in a more expensive, longer-lasting model.
A higher-priced grill, say $1000, would need a 20-year lifespan to match the overall cost per year of this cheaper grill. This calculation highlights the trade-off between initial cost and longevity.
While the Nexgrill initially seemed cost-effective, the ongoing need for component replacements and the relatively short lifespan of the overall grill means a more expensive model might be a wiser long-term investment for those who regularly use their grills.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The Nexgrill provided adequate grilling functionality for its price point, exceeding the initial expected lifespan. However, the extensive rust and the need for part replacements significantly impacted its overall longevity and cost-effectiveness.
For occasional users on a tight budget, the Nexgrill might be a suitable option. However, for frequent grill users or those seeking a longer-lasting product, investing in a more expensive, high-quality grill might be a more prudent financial decision in the long run.
Consider your grilling frequency and budget when making a decision. While the Nexgrill offers an affordable starting point, the total cost of ownership over time might outweigh its initial savings.